Cathkin was the junction on the Goulburn Valley Highway where the track split into the
Mansfield line
continuing in a north - easterly direction and the
Alexandra branch going towards the Southeast. There were three roads, one (livestock?) stub and a turntable off the Alexandra road, past the level crossing. I am not at all sure why Cathkin had a turntable, as both Mansfield and Alexandra had one and it seems pretty unlikely that trains regularly terminated at Cathkin. The only reason I can think of is that there could have been direct goods traffic between Mansfield and Alexandra and vice versa, in which case locos
may have been turned at Cathkin, but it was never a terminus, as the line was immediately continued to
Alexandra Road (Koriella).
Better informed heads than mine may be able to tell me the reason...
Having another look ...
Newsrail photo
(Thank you , Mark Bau)
Now, the thing for me to do was to decide how to deal with
Cathkin. There would be no turntable, the
only one would be at Alexandra, so the 'J' Class could be turned - should I ever be able to obtain
anything that looked remotely like the VR prototype...(I eventually did get
J529 from
PSM!!)
The next thing that bothered me was the fact that both
Cathkin and
Alexandra stations were on the aisle
(South) side of the layout.I didn't fancy the idea of looking over the top of them. So the decision was made
to transfer both stations to the North of the line . In the case of Cathkin, I flipped the whole yard around.
putting the goods shed onto the stub track. I also deleted Nr.3 road.
The only thing left to do was to take the Mansfield line, once it was past the level crossing, into a cutting,
duly camouflaged, and take it underneath the layout and back all the way to 'Tallarook', 'Homewood' and back into
Yea.
Cathkin diagram source: Mark Bau
Theory is a wonderful thing, but all this would have to be turned into reality.-
Walter, the stub ended road looks to be used more for a head shunt rather than a cattle road, to avoid fouling the main, although I could be wrong.
ReplyDeleteCheers
Shelton
Thanks, Shelton, that makes more sense than my guess. Perhaps others
ReplyDeletecan verify either possibility.
Regards, Walter.